1. This article addresses the primary concern that as technology continues to advance, our world will soon be taken over by robots that will have minds of their own and be able to make decisions for themselves. This will therefore mean that there will no longer be a need for humans. Joy creates an overall negative view for the future in his writing.
2. Joy uses an ethical standpoint to back up some of his arguments. Joy claims that the growth and development of nanotechnology has the potential to create some dangerous outcomes. He claims that if we do not consider the ethical issue of nanotechnology then there is a “risk that we might destroy the biosphere on which all life depends.” Obviously he is trying to create an emotional appeal to the reader here since no one wants the biosphere to be destroyed. Joy points out that the development of genetic technologies has already caused ethical issues in our society. As he states, “the general public is aware of, and uneasy about genetically modified foods, and seems to be rejecting the notion that such foods should be permitted to be unlabeled.” Joy goes farther with the point and proposes his concern being that genetic engineering may ultimately unintentionally create a “white plague,” which is a disaster where a particular group of people is selectively destroyed due to genetic manipulation. Through genetic technology, humans may be able to develop the means to reengineer themselves into different species, which could lead to many problems in society. Joy also brings up his concern with artificial intelligence. If robots become capable of thinking and making decisions for themselves, they will eventually be able to self-replicate and become superior to humans. Joy’s use of examples are effective because he is able to back up a lot of his arguments with concrete points that people can relate to. Also, his uses of ethical and emotional appeals are really effective because the concern for human existence is something that every member of society is going to be concerned with. Most likely, no one is going to argue against the fact that a human being destroyed is something we must avoid at all costs.
3. I would say that these issues have become more relevant since this article was written because there have been many new technological advances since 2000. I would say that for the most part, our technologies have been positive ones and have allowed our society to advance. Therefore, I disagree with Joy’s overall pessimistic view of the future of technology. I don’t think we have to worry about these things that Joy speaks of actually becoming a problem. The technologies we have developed over the last 11 years have allowed for many advances in fields such as medicine, prosthetics, and analytics. I don’t foresee that the technologies of the future will cause robots to take over the world. I feel that for the most part technology isn’t abused and is used to make positive advancements in our world.